Not just for plurals anymore, close variants will extend to include word ordering and function words in inexact match keywords.
In the good old days, “exact” meant exact. Then things got fuzzier. Now they’re about to get downright blurry.
On Friday afternoon, Google announced another change to
the way exact match targeting works in AdWords. Matching for close
variants — plurals, typos, abbreviations, adverbs and so on — will
be broadened to include variations in word order and function words in
the coming months. With this change, Google may ignore word order
and function words when determining whether an ad should trigger for an
exact match keyword.
Google
introduced close variants in 2012 as a way to capture plurals,
misspellings, typos and other versions of exact match and phrase match
keywords to broaden reach and coverage and save time building out
keyword lists. Advertisers that wanted tighter control were able to opt
out of close variant matching until 2014, when Google removed the ability to opt out of close variants for exact match and phrase match. Bing followed suit shortly
the following year. The latest blurring of what exact match means is
Google’s increasing trust in its machine learning and the belief that
it’s now at the point where advertisers can let the algorithms take over
and focus on other things. Google says early tests indicate advertisers
could see up to 3 percent more exact match clicks on average while
maintaining comparable click-through and conversion rates.
What the change means
There
are many cases in which variations can change the meaning of a
keyword. Take a recent example of [pancake mix] being matched to a
search for “pancake mixer.” Those are not the same thing. However, there
are many cases in which variations don’t change the meaning at all.
Here are the nuts and bolts of how these changes are meant to work:
Function words
Function words are binding words phrases and sentences like the and that, conjunctions like and and but, prepositions, pronouns, quantifiers like all and some, modals like could and would and auxiliary/hedging verbs like be or might or will. Essentially, they are words that don’t have meaning on their own. Well, hmmm, unless by will you mean a legal document.
With this change, function words may be ignored, replaced or added.
For
example, the exact match keyword [restaurants cleveland ] could match
to the query “restaurants in cleveland.” More examples from Google:
Word order
Notice
in that last Miami cruise example, the function word changed along with
the word order. Word order often doesn’t make a difference (in
English), and users often don’t use natural word order when searching
even though the intent is the same. Take a keyword like [teacher gift
ideas]. The meaning doesn’t change with [ideas gift teachers] or [ideas
teacher gift]. You’d never say either of those out loud, but the intent
is clearly the same.
When
word order is changed, Google says it will not add words to keywords
(though it may change function words as shown in the Miami cruise
example above).
Exceptions
One
of the biggest concerns from advertisers will be whether Google matches
queries to keywords that don’t have the same meaning. Google stresses
it will not change word order or function words in exact match when it
understands changes would alter the meaning of the query.
Take
the case of a query like “LAX to JFK flights.” The user obviously
doesn’t want to see ads for “JFK to LAX flights” or for “LAX from JFK
flights.” That’s a pretty straightforward scenario for Google to
recognize.
But
something like [android compatible] does not mean the same thing as
[compatible android]. Maybe Google will know, maybe it won’t, at least
not right away.
These
changes do not apply to phrase match keywords. And AdWords is still
designed to prioritize matching identical keywords to identical search
queries.
Google’s
philosophy is: Spread a wider net, and then filter out what you don’t
want, rather than build a net that might not be big enough to catch
everything you want. Better to waste money on some bad keywords than to
miss out on some potentially good ones.
Often
this approach works. And it certainly works much more often than it did
even a few years ago. It’s the rare person who misses building out
endless iterations of keywords, but many will feel the pendulum is
swinging too far in Google’s favor with this change. It strips more
control from advertisers and puts the onus on them to say what queries
they don’t want their ads showing up on rather than what they do want.
There are financial implications to putting the emphasis on building
out lists of negatives. Inappropriate variations are often discovered
only after an advertiser has paid for wasted clicks and the variation
shows up in a search query report. Precision control is being ceded to
the machines.
How to manage these changes
This
change means advertisers will have to be increasingly diligent about
mining search query reports and thinking ahead about unintended
consequences when word order matters.
There are a few things you can do to prepare for the coming changes.
- Review existing exact match queries and determine if the loss of function words or a reordering of the words changes the meaning. Add those variations as negatives in your campaigns.
- Review close variants in your Search Query Reports to see if other variations are currently being triggered that might be affected by these changes. Add those as negatives.
- Starting in April, step up your mining of Search Query Reports, particularly for close variants.
- Get ready to update your scripts. If you are using a script like the one from BrainLabs to make exact match exact, it will need to be updated. We will provide a link here when a new version is available.
Source:- http://searchengineland.com/google-exact-match-close-variants-word-order-function-words-271395
No comments:
Post a Comment